Poppy Playtime Trademark Infringement Lawsuit: Mob Entertainment Schedule A Case No. 1:26-cv-11687
Mob Entertainment, Inc. Files a Federal Trademark Lawsuit on September 23, 2026, in the Northern District of Illinois – Poppy Playtime Brand Claims, Amended Complaint, and Docket Updates
Mob Entertainment, Inc. filed a federal trademark infringement lawsuit on September 23, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The lawsuit reportedly concerns alleged infringement of trademark rights associated with Poppy Playtime, the horror video game franchise developed by Mob Entertainment.
The lawsuit initially identified defendants through Schedule A, a format commonly used in intellectual property enforcement actions involving online sellers and e-commerce businesses.
Court records show that Mob Entertainment subsequently amended its complaint to identify a specific defendant, playgig, rather than continuing against the original Schedule A defendants.
This is a separate proceeding from other Mob Entertainment Schedule A lawsuits filed during September 2026, including Case No. 1:26-cv-11456.
Case Information
Plaintiff: Mob Entertainment, Inc.
Original Defendants: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Defendant Named in Amended Complaint: playgig
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Case No.: 1:26-cv-11687
Date Filed: September 23, 2026
Presiding Judge: Hon. Jorge L. Alonso
Nature of Action: Trademark Infringement – 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (Lanham Act)
Reported Brand at Issue: Poppy Playtime
Case Update: On September 23, 2026, Mob Entertainment filed its complaint, submitted Schedule A and a supporting exhibit under seal, and requested permission to file certain documents under seal. On September 24, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming playgig and withdrew its sealing motion. On September 30, the court denied the withdrawn sealing motion as moot and scheduled a telephonic status hearing for November 19, 2026, with a status report due November 16.
About the Plaintiff
Mob Entertainment, Inc. is an American video game development and entertainment company best known for creating Poppy Playtime, a horror-themed puzzle adventure franchise featuring recognizable characters such as Huggy Wuggy and CatNap.
The franchise's branding and characters appear in video games and related merchandise, including toys, plush products, apparel, and collectibles.
Mob Entertainment maintains intellectual property rights associated with its entertainment properties. The specific trademarks and allegedly infringing products involved in this lawsuit should be confirmed through the complaint and supporting exhibits.
Monitor the Case
Public case information for Mob Entertainment, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, later amended to identify playgig, Case No. 1:26-cv-11687, is linked through PacerMonitor.
PacerMonitor provides access to federal court case information, although certain documents and features may require registration or payment. Court filings and case status may change over time.
The allegations are claims made by the plaintiff and do not, by themselves, establish liability.
Named in a Schedule A Lawsuit?
If your online store or business has been identified as a defendant in a Schedule A lawsuit, Rotek Law can assist in reviewing the allegations, evaluating potential legal options, and discussing possible resolutions.
Our team can help you understand the claims against your business and determine appropriate next steps. You may also explore our legal services for more information about our intellectual property practice.
Contact Us: +1 (305) 731-2593 Email: info@roteklaw.com
More Intellectual Property Case Updates
Stay informed about other Schedule A lawsuits, intellectual property disputes, and legal developments affecting online businesses.
Disclaimer
This page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Case information may change as court proceedings develop. Readers should verify current case details through official court records. Viewing this page or contacting Rotek Law does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
Comments