Philippa Kirsten Tacla Irish Elk Copyright Lawsuit: Schedule A Case No. 1:26-cv-11850
Philippa Kirsten Tacla Files a Federal Copyright Lawsuit on September 28, 2026, in the Northern District of Illinois – Irish Elk Wildlife Illustration, Copyright Claims, and Docket Updates
Philippa Kirsten Tacla filed a federal copyright infringement lawsuit on September 28, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The lawsuit reportedly concerns alleged unauthorized reproduction and commercial use of a copyrighted illustration depicting an Irish elk, also known as Megaloceros.
The lawsuit was filed against defendants identified through Schedule A, a format commonly used in intellectual property enforcement actions involving multiple online sellers and e-commerce businesses.
Third-party reporting identifies Tacla's Irish Elk (Megaloceros) illustration as the artwork involved in the dispute. The precise copyright claims, allegedly infringing products, and registration details should be confirmed through the complaint and supporting exhibits.
This is a separate proceeding from Tacla's earlier copyright lawsuit, Case No. 1:26-cv-04644, which was dismissed without prejudice in June 2026.
Case Information
Plaintiff: Philippa Kirsten Tacla
Defendants: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Case No.: 1:26-cv-11850
Date Filed: September 28, 2026
Presiding Judge: Hon. John Robert Blakey
Nature of Action: Copyright Infringement – 17 U.S.C. § 101 (Copyright Act)
Reported Copyright Registration: VA 2-468-201 (subject to verification)
Reported Work at Issue: Irish Elk (Megaloceros) wildlife illustration
Case Update: On September 28, 2026, Philippa Kirsten Tacla filed her copyright infringement complaint with a supporting exhibit and submitted Schedule A identifying defendants. The docket also records a civil cover sheet and several attorney notices of appearance filed on behalf of the plaintiff that day.
The available public docket does not establish the outcome of subsequent motions or substantive court rulings.
About the Plaintiff
Philippa Kirsten Tacla, also known as Pip Tacla, is an Australian artist and illustrator whose creative work reportedly focuses on wildlife, zoology, paleontology, and natural history.
Her illustrations are associated with detailed representations of animals, including extinct species, and incorporate traditional artistic techniques such as watercolor, gouache, and pencil.
Tacla's work reflects an interest in combining artistic expression with subjects drawn from the natural world.
The lawsuit reportedly concerns her illustration of an Irish elk, a prehistoric deer species recognized for its exceptionally large antlers.
The specific copyrighted artwork, ownership information, and registration asserted in this lawsuit should be verified through the complaint and supporting evidence.
Monitor the Case
Public case information for Philippa Kirsten Tacla v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Case No. 1:26-cv-11850, is available through PacerMonitor.
PacerMonitor provides access to federal court case information, although certain documents and features may require registration or payment. Court filings and case status may change over time.
The allegations are claims made by the plaintiff and do not, by themselves, establish liability.
Named in a Schedule A Lawsuit?
If your online store or business has been identified as a defendant in a Schedule A lawsuit, Rotek Law can assist in reviewing the allegations, evaluating potential legal options, and discussing possible resolutions.
Our team can help you understand the claims against your business and determine appropriate next steps. You may also explore our legal services for more information about our intellectual property practice.
Contact Us: +1 (305) 731-2593 Email: info@roteklaw.com
More Intellectual Property Case Updates
Stay informed about other Schedule A lawsuits, intellectual property disputes, and legal developments affecting online businesses.
Disclaimer
This page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Case information may change as court proceedings develop. Readers should verify current case details through official court records. Viewing this page or contacting Rotek Law does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
Comments