top of page

Nadine Spengler Tiger Illustration Copyright Lawsuit: Schedule A Case No. 1:26-cv-12038

Writer: Cristian Rodriguez
Cristian Rodriguez
Oct 27
3 min read

Nadine Spengler Files a Federal Copyright Lawsuit on September 30, 2026, in the Northern District of Illinois – Manipulator of Black Holes Artwork, Copyright Infringement Claims, Schedule A Defendants, and Docket Updates 


Nadine Spengler filed a federal copyright infringement lawsuit on September 30, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The lawsuit reportedly concerns alleged unauthorized reproduction and commercial use of Manipulator of Black Holes, a fantasy-style illustration featuring a tiger and distinctive neon-colored visual elements. 


The lawsuit was filed against defendants identified through Schedule A, a format commonly used in intellectual property enforcement actions involving multiple online sellers and e-commerce businesses. 


Third-party reporting identifies Manipulator of Black Holes as the copyrighted work involved in this proceeding. The specific allegedly infringing merchandise, defendant identities, and copyright ownership claims should be confirmed through the complaint and supporting exhibits. 


This is a separate proceeding from Spengler's earlier copyright lawsuit, Case No. 1:26-cv-04974, filed on April 30, 2026. 


Case Information 


Plaintiff: Nadine Spengler 

Defendants: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A 

Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois 

Case No.: 1:26-cv-12038 

Date Filed: September 30, 2026 

Presiding Judge: Hon. Charles P. Kocoras 

Nature of Action: Copyright Infringement – 17 U.S.C. § 101 (Copyright Act) 

Reported Copyright Registration: VA 2-467-481 (subject to verification) 

Reported Work at Issue: Manipulator of Black Holes – a neon-colored fantasy illustration featuring a tiger 

Plaintiff's Counsel: Keith A. Vogt and associated counsel 

Case Update: On September 30, 2026, Nadine Spengler filed her federal copyright infringement complaint with supporting Exhibit 1 and submitted Schedule A identifying defendants. 


The docket also records a civil cover sheet and seven attorney notices of appearance filed on behalf of the plaintiff that day. 


Third-party reporting published in October 2026 associates this lawsuit with Manipulator of Black Holes and Copyright Registration No. VA 2-467-481. 


The accessible public docket does not establish whether the plaintiff subsequently requested or obtained temporary injunctive relief, whether the list of defendants was amended, or the outcome of substantive court rulings. 


About the Plaintiff 


Nadine Spengler is an artist identified as the plaintiff in this federal copyright infringement lawsuit. 


Case-specific reporting describes the plaintiff as a freelance illustrator and character designer associated with fantasy-themed artwork featuring imaginative creatures, detailed visual compositions, and vibrant colors. 


The artwork reportedly involved in this action, Manipulator of Black Holes, features a tiger rendered with a distinctive fantasy-inspired aesthetic and luminous color effects. 

Spengler has pursued copyright enforcement in other federal proceedings, including a separate case filed in April 2026. 


Through the September 30 lawsuit, the plaintiff asserts copyright interests against defendants allegedly involved in unauthorized reproduction or commercial use of protected artwork. 


The precise copyrighted work, registration details, ownership information, and allegedly infringing products should be verified through the complaint and supporting evidence. 


Monitor the Case 


Public case information for Nadine Spengler v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Case No. 1:26-cv-12038, is available through PacerMonitor. 



PacerMonitor provides access to federal court case information, although certain documents and features may require registration or payment. Court filings and case status may change over time. 


The allegations are claims made by the plaintiff and do not, by themselves, establish liability. 


Named in a Schedule A Lawsuit? 


If your online store or business has been identified as a defendant in a Schedule A lawsuit, Rotek Law can assist in reviewing the allegations, evaluating potential legal options, and discussing possible resolutions. 



Our team can help you understand the claims against your business and determine appropriate next steps. You may also explore our legal services for more information about our intellectual property practice. 


Contact Us: +1 (305) 731-2593 Email: info@roteklaw.com 


More Intellectual Property Case Updates 


Stay informed about other Schedule A lawsuits, intellectual property disputes, and legal developments affecting online businesses. 



Disclaimer 


This page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Case information may change as court proceedings develop. Readers should verify current case details through official court records. Viewing this page or contacting Rotek Law does not establish an attorney-client relationship. 

 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page