top of page

Barred Rock Hen Copyright Lawsuit: Carolyn Betty-Loes Guske Schedule A Case No. 1:26-cv-11384

Writer: Cristian Rodriguez
Cristian Rodriguez
3 days ago
2 min read

Carolyn Betty-Loes Guske Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Filed September 17, 2026, in the Northern District of Illinois – Barred Rock Hen Artwork Claims, Case Details, and Docket Updates 


Carolyn Betty-Loes Guske filed a federal copyright infringement lawsuit on September 17, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The case reportedly concerns alleged unauthorized reproduction and commercial use of her artwork Barred Rock Hen, featuring an illustration of a black-and-white barred chicken. 


The lawsuit was filed against defendants identified through Schedule A, a format commonly used in intellectual property enforcement actions involving online sellers and e-commerce businesses. 


Case Information 


Plaintiff: Carolyn Betty-Loes Guske 

Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois 

Case No.: 1:26-cv-11384 

Date Filed: September 17, 2026 

Presiding Judge: Hon. Mary M. Rowland 

Nature of Action: Copyright Infringement – 17 U.S.C. § 101 (Copyright Act) 

Artwork at Issue: Barred Rock Hen (as identified in secondary case reporting) 

Case Update: On September 17, 2026, the plaintiff filed her complaint, Schedule A, and supporting exhibits. She also requested permission to file certain documents under seal and sought a temporary restraining order. 


About the Plaintiff 


Carolyn Betty-Loes Guske is an American artist and illustrator with a background in animation and visual design. Her artwork includes detailed animal illustrations, particularly representations of traditional farm animals and poultry. 


Her illustration Barred Rock Hen has been identified in reporting about the lawsuit and is associated with her collection of farm animal illustrations. 


Monitor the Case 


Public case information for Carolyn Betty-Loes Guske v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Case No. 1:26-cv-11384, is available through PacerMonitor. 



PacerMonitor provides access to federal court case information, although certain documents and features may require registration or payment. Court filings and case status may change over time. 


The allegations are claims made by the plaintiff and do not, by themselves, establish liability. 


Named in a Schedule A Lawsuit? 


If your online store or business has been identified as a defendant in a Schedule A lawsuit, Rotek Law can assist in reviewing the allegations, evaluating potential legal options, and discussing possible resolutions. 



Our team can help you understand the claims against your business and determine appropriate next steps. You may also explore our legal services for more information about our intellectual property practice. 


Contact Us: +1 (305) 731-2593 Email: info@roteklaw.com 


More Intellectual Property Case Updates 


Stay informed about other Schedule A lawsuits, intellectual property disputes, and legal developments affecting online businesses. 



Disclaimer 


This page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Case information may change as court proceedings develop. Readers should verify current case details through official court records. Viewing this page or contacting Rotek Law does not establish an attorney-client relationship. 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page